Thread (98 messages) flat view 98 messages, 6 authors, 2022-02-02

In-tree strbuf "in-place" search/replace (was: [PATCH v2 6/8] merge-ort: format messages slightly different for use in headers)

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-26 18:47:29

On Sat, Dec 25 2021, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -634,17 +634,46 @@ static void path_msg(struct merge_options *opt,
 		     const char *fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list ap;
-	struct strbuf *sb = strmap_get(&opt->priv->output, path);
+	struct strbuf *sb, *dest;
+	struct strbuf tmp = STRBUF_INIT;
+
+	if (opt->record_conflict_msgs_as_headers && omittable_hint)
+		return; /* Do not record mere hints in tree */
+	sb = strmap_get(&opt->priv->output, path);
 	if (!sb) {
 		sb = xmalloc(sizeof(*sb));
 		strbuf_init(sb, 0);
 		strmap_put(&opt->priv->output, path, sb);
 	}
 
+	dest = (opt->record_conflict_msgs_as_headers ? &tmp : sb);
+
 	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	strbuf_vaddf(sb, fmt, ap);
+	strbuf_vaddf(dest, fmt, ap);
 	va_end(ap);
 
+	if (opt->record_conflict_msgs_as_headers) {
+		int i_sb = 0, i_tmp = 0;
+
+		/* Copy tmp to sb, adding spaces after newlines */
+		strbuf_grow(sb, 2*tmp.len); /* more than sufficient */
+		for (; i_tmp < tmp.len; i_tmp++, i_sb++) {
+			/* Copy next character from tmp to sb */
+			sb->buf[sb->len + i_sb] = tmp.buf[i_tmp];
+
+			/* If we copied a newline, add a space */
+			if (tmp.buf[i_tmp] == '\n')
+				sb->buf[++i_sb] = ' ';
+		}
+		/* Update length and ensure it's NUL-terminated */
+		sb->len += i_sb;
+		sb->buf[sb->len] = '\0';
+
+		/* Clean up tmp */
+		strbuf_release(&tmp);
+	}
+
+	/* Add final newline character to sb */
 	strbuf_addch(sb, '\n');
 }
 
I'm not saying this is wrong or needs to change. Just a reader's note
that this sent me on an interesting journey of looking at various
in-tree callers of strbufs that want to do the equivalent of
s/$from/$to/ on a strbuf, with and without the equivalent of /g.

I figured I'd change the $subject since this is more of a general
musing...

In trailer.c we've got strbuf_replace(), which looks like it could be
made to be general enough to serve most callers if it did a memmem()
instead of a strstr(), and knew to take a "all" flag to implement a /g.

We then have e.g. lf_to_crlf() in imap-send.c, which uses a newly
alloc'd buffer followed by a strbuf_attach(), which is a common pattern.

Then strbuf_reencode() in strbuf.c basically solves this problem, and
calls reencode_string_len(), both it and the underlying function are
*almost* general enough to know to take some "from/to" string/length
pair, i.e. to not be bound to "reencoding" only with iconv().

Then there's strbuf_add_percentencode() and strbuf_add_urlencode() whose
API users might be happy with in-place replacing, but do a
read-and-copy-maybe-expand.

It might be an interesting follow-up project for someone to come up with
a generic in-place search-replace function with a signature like:

	int strbuf_replace(struct strbuf *sb, const char *from,
			   size_t from_len, const char *to,
			   size_t to_len, int max);

To do e.g. in this case:

	if (opt->record_conflict_msgs_as_headers)
		strbuf_replace(sb, "\n", strlen("\n"), "\n ", strlen("\n "), -1);

The various in-tree implementations do some variant of over-mallocing to
save work in the loop (as is being done here), copying where a small
realloc/memmove might do, scanning the string to figure out how much to
malloc, then copying in a second pass etc.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help