Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2021-12-09

Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] t5403: refactor rebase post-checkout hook tests

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-09 18:24:37

"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref] writes:
From: Phillip Wood <redacted>

These tests only test the default backend and do not check that the
arguments passed to the hook are correct. Fix this by running the
tests with both backends and adding checks for the hook arguments.
Nice.
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <redacted>
---
 t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh b/t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh
index 1ec9e23be75..272b02687ba 100755
--- a/t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh
+++ b/t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh
@@ -49,23 +49,33 @@ test_expect_success 'post-checkout receives the right args when not switching br
 	test $old = $new && test $flag = 0
 '
 
-test_expect_success 'post-checkout is triggered on rebase' '
-	test_when_finished "rm -f .git/post-checkout.args" &&
-	git checkout -b rebase-test main &&
-	rm -f .git/post-checkout.args &&
-	git rebase rebase-on-me &&
-	read old new flag <.git/post-checkout.args &&
-	test $old != $new && test $flag = 1
-'
+test_rebase () {
+	args="$*" &&
+	test_expect_success "post-checkout is triggered on rebase $args" '
+		test_when_finished "rm -f .git/post-checkout.args" &&
+		git checkout -B rebase-test main &&
+		rm -f .git/post-checkout.args &&
+		git rebase $args rebase-on-me &&
+		read old new flag <.git/post-checkout.args &&
+		test_cmp_rev main $old &&
+		test_cmp_rev rebase-on-me $new &&
+		test $flag = 1
+	'
OK, so we now make sure $old and $new are what we expect, in
addition to what $flag we got.  And the change from -b to -B is
understandable as this needs to be prepared to run more than once.
-test_expect_success 'post-checkout is triggered on rebase with fast-forward' '
-	test_when_finished "rm -f .git/post-checkout.args" &&
-	git checkout -b ff-rebase-test rebase-on-me^ &&
-	rm -f .git/post-checkout.args &&
-	git rebase rebase-on-me &&
-	read old new flag <.git/post-checkout.args &&
-	test $old != $new && test $flag = 1
-'
+	test_expect_success "post-checkout is triggered on rebase $args with fast-forward" '
+		test_when_finished "rm -f .git/post-checkout.args" &&
+		git checkout -B ff-rebase-test rebase-on-me^ &&
+		rm -f .git/post-checkout.args &&
+		git rebase $args rebase-on-me &&
+		read old new flag <.git/post-checkout.args &&
+		test_cmp_rev rebase-on-me^ $old &&
+		test_cmp_rev rebase-on-me $new &&
+		test $flag = 1
+	'
+}
Likewise.
+test_rebase --apply &&
+test_rebase --merge
I am not sure if "&&" is appropriate here.  It is like saying

	test_expect_success "test on apply" '
		body of apply test
	' &&

	test_expect_success "test on merge" '
		body of merge test
	'

no?  In other words, even if somebody broke the apply backend, we
still are interested in seeing the merge backend succeed.
 test_expect_success 'post-checkout hook is triggered by clone' '
 	mkdir -p templates/hooks &&
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help