Re: pull.rebase config option broken in 2.33.1
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-27 05:07:17
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 02:43:44PM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 1:45 PM Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 04:44:52PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:quoted
+cc Alex and Elijah from the original 3d5fc24dae (pull: abort if --ff-only is given and fast-forwarding is impossible, 2021-07-21) in case they have further thoughts, but I _think_ this is working as designed.Whoops, forgot the cc. Original message in full below.I believe this was already fixed in 2.34.1 in commit ea1954af77 ("pull: should be noop when already-up-to-date", 2021-11-17).
I thought that at first, too, but this case is a bit different:
quoted
quoted
In the bug I linked (and what got fixed in 2.34.1), the issue is that when the local branch is ahead of the remote, we don't say "up to date", but complain about fast-forwards. It's hard to tell from the output above, but it looks like you have a case where there are new commits both locally and on the remote? In which case a rebase would work just fine.
I think the key thing here is that (AFAICT) the behavior is unchanged unless the user has set pull.ff=only explicitly. -Peff