Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2021-10-29

Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] git hook run: add an --ignore-missing flag

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-29 05:59:21

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
+	int ignore_missing = 0;
 	const char *hook_name;
 	const char *hook_path;
 	struct option run_options[] = {
+		OPT_BOOL(0, "ignore-missing", &ignore_missing,
+			 N_("silently ignore missing requested <hook-name>")),
 		OPT_END(),
 	};
 	int ret;
@@ -53,6 +56,8 @@ static int run(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 	git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
 
 	hook_name = argv[0];
+	if (ignore_missing)
+		return run_hooks_oneshot(hook_name, &opt);
 	hook_path = find_hook(hook_name);
 	if (!hook_path) {
 		error("cannot find a hook named %s", hook_name);
Given that the rest of this "run()" function is more or less
identical to run_hooks_oneshot(), I have to wonder why we do not
give an .ignore_missing member to the hooks_opt structure to be done
with this.  Otehrwise, every time the underlying run_hooks()
interface needs to change, we need to update two places, no?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help