Re: SubmittingPatchs: clarify choice of base and testing

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

@@ -260,8 +281,8 @@ or include any extra files which do not relate to what your patch
 is trying to achieve. Make sure to review
 your patch after generating it, to ensure accuracy.  Before
 sending out, please make sure it cleanly applies to the `master`
-branch head.  If you are preparing a work based on "next" branch,
-that is fine, but please mark it as such.
+branch head.  If you are preparing a work based on selected topics
+merged to `master`, please mark your patch as such.

I think this meant to say 'merged to "next|maint|seen"'?
Or topics selected for being merged into master?

Ah, thanks for catching.  I meant "not merged to 'master'" (will fix
locally).

Sorry, should have re-read it more carefully.  The original text
is saying what I wanted to say, but I misread it ;-)

We earlier in the document said that there are three possible bases;
fixes are usually based on 'maint', new features on 'master', but as
an exception, if your new feature need to depend on something not
yet in 'master', then you start a branch from 'master', merge
selected topics into that branch, and use the resulting branch as
the 'base' of your topic.  We do not want a new topic based on
'next', so preparing such a synthetic base by starting from 'next'
and merging topics that are not yet in 'next' is unwelcome.

Perhaps there needs some rewording to clarify that the sentence is
referring to that case.

Thanks again.