Thread (70 messages) flat view 70 messages, 8 authors, 2021-11-05

Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] generate-cmdlist.sh: do not shell out to "sed"

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-25 16:46:47

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 09:36:12PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
From: Jeff King <redacted>

Replace the "sed" invocation in get_synopsis() with a pure-shell
version. This speeds up generate-cmdlist.sh significantly. Compared to
HEAD~ (old) and "master" we are, according to hyperfine(1):
Unsurprisingly I'm in favor of this. ;)

Curiously again, I get more dramatic results than you:
  'sh generate-cmdlist.sh command-list.txt' ran
   12.69 ± 5.01 times faster than 'sh generate-cmdlist.sh.old command-list.txt'
   18.34 ± 3.03 times faster than 'sh generate-cmdlist.sh.master command-list.txt'
    'sh generate-cmdlist.sh command-list.txt' ran
     22.44 ± 13.59 times faster than 'sh generate-cmdlist.sh.old command-list.txt'
     57.35 ± 34.10 times faster than 'sh generate-cmdlist.sh.master command-list.txt'

It's like spawning processes is somehow faster on your machine than
mine. I wonder if it's a CPU governor thing. This is a laptop, and those
numbers come from using "powersave". Doing "cpufreq-set -g performance",
I get:

   'sh generate-cmdlist.sh command-list.txt' ran
   14.35 ± 0.23 times faster than 'sh generate-cmdlist.sh.old command-list.txt'
   33.15 ± 0.50 times faster than 'sh generate-cmdlist.sh.master command-list.txt'

which is closer. But most notably all versions are 3-5x faster than
their "powersave" counterparts. I wonder if that has been driving some
of the confusion in our timings in this thread.

Either way, I think this is still a good direction to go.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help