Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] for-each-ref: delay parsing of --sort=<atom> options + linux-leaks fixes

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  [off-list ref] writes:

I tried to structure this as somethnig that could be merged or queued
up separately, but the semantic conflict in "branch.c" was difficult,
as Junio's patch changes how those variables are managed.

I tend to agree that it would have been simpler if you did 1, 2 and
4 first and then rebased 3 on top, possibly as an "after the dust
settles" separate topic.

The releasing of these allocated pieces of memory does make sense.

Thanks.