Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Derrick Stolee [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I generally consider any interaction with the commit-graph while
replace refs are enabled to be the bug. We don't read the commit-graph
when replace refs are on, so why are we verifying it?
But, I understand the desire to check the on-disk content even though
it is not being used, so disabling replace refs to do the verify should
be sufficient.
That's quite a sensible argument. Sounds like we have a way to
solve this that everybody agrees with.
Would it be sensible to silently ignore, though? Would a warning,
when we see replacement is in use and an explicit request by an end
user is made to make use of or update the commit-graph, be too loud?