Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2021-09-28

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: avoid multiple -Wall in CFLAGS

flat view

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-28 09:52:10

On Tue, Sep 28 2021, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
6163f3f1a4 (config.mak.dev: add -Wall, primarily for -Wformat, to help
autoconf users, 2018-10-12) adds a second -Wall in config.mak.dev to
workaround the lack of one from config.mak.autogen.

Since 6d5d4b4e93 (Makefile: allow for combining DEVELOPER=1 and
CFLAGS="...", 2019-02-22), that variable is set instead as part of
DEVELOPER_FLAGS which won't be overriden by config.mak.autogen, so
it can be safely removed from config.mak.dev if set instead in the
Makefile.

This also has the advantage of separating cleanly CFLAGS which are
used for building with the ones that provide with diagnostics.

Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <redacted>
---
 Makefile       | 3 ++-
 config.mak.dev | 1 -
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 9df565f27b..963b9e7c6b 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1200,7 +1200,8 @@ endif
 # Set CFLAGS, LDFLAGS and other *FLAGS variables. These might be
 # tweaked by config.* below as well as the command-line, both of
 # which'll override these defaults.
-CFLAGS = -g -O2 -Wall
+CFLAGS = -g -O2
+DEVELOPER_CFLAGS = -Wall
 LDFLAGS =
 CC_LD_DYNPATH = -Wl,-rpath,
 BASIC_CFLAGS = -I.
diff --git a/config.mak.dev b/config.mak.dev
index c81be62a5c..90c47d2782 100644
--- a/config.mak.dev
+++ b/config.mak.dev
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ ifeq ($(filter no-error,$(DEVOPTS)),)
 DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Werror
 SPARSE_FLAGS += -Wsparse-error
 endif
-DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Wall
 ifeq ($(filter no-pedantic,$(DEVOPTS)),)
 DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -pedantic
 ifneq ($(filter clang4 gcc5,$(COMPILER_FEATURES)),)
This really breaks things for anyone who's relying on specifing CFLAGS
now to clobber the default -Wall configuration, e.g. on both xlc and aCC
after this:

    xlc: 1501-289 (W) Option -Wall was incorrectly specified. The option will be ignored.
    cc: error 1914: bad form for `-W' option

I.e. they didn't work before, but I've got CFLAGS="-g -O0" for both in
my build scripts, so they didn't get -Wall before, but now they do, so
I'll need:

    CFLAGS=<that> DEVELOPER_CFLAGS=

And in my own dev setup I do in config.mak: "CFLAGS=-g -O0", and then
rely on config.mak.dev to set -Wall, but if I did e.g.:

    DEVELOPER= CFLAGS="-g -O0 -Wall"

I'd end up with -Wall twice, gcc doesn't complain, but maybe some other
toolchains do.

For the former case this seems like a really odd and leaky interface
since I don't have DEVELOPER=1. Let's leave DEVOPTS, DEVELOPER_CFLAGS
etc. etc. only in effect for anyone who turns on that option.

Anyway, I don't think it's a no-go to make a change in this direction,
and while it would break builds for some perhaps the end result is worth
it. I haven't really looked closely enough at the Makefile logic you're
untangling to form an opinion on it.

But I think this needs to at least have
s/DEVELOPER_CFLAGS/WARNING_CFLAGS/g or something.

But not to saddle you with an impossible task, wouldn't this whole thing
be much easier if we included config.mak* before setting our own CFLAGS
etc. defaults? But of course that would break for anyone relying on "+="
working, so I don't know.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help