Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] send-email docs: add format-patch options
From: Carlo Arenas <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-24 04:54:09
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2021-09-29 · Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] send-email docs: add format-patch options · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2021-09-25 · Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] send-email docs: add format-patch options · Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <hidden>
- 2021-09-25 · Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] send-email docs: add format-patch options · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2021-09-25 · Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] send-email docs: add format-patch options · Bagas Sanjaya <hidden>
- 2021-09-24 · Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] send-email docs: add format-patch options · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 9:36 PM Bagas Sanjaya [off-list ref] wrote:
On 24/09/21 09.46, Thiago Perrotta wrote:quoted
SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git send-email' [<options>] <file|directory|rev-list options>... +'git send-email' [<options>] <file|directory>... +'git send-email' [<options>] <format-patch options> 'git send-email' --dump-aliasesIs <format-patch options> optional? If so, we can say [<format-patch options>].
no; as Junio explained [1] this omission is intentional while the rev-list options that got cut to make space are not and are more relevant. IMHO leaving [<options>] to imply ALL options (that also include diff options, for example) is better Carlo [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqh7fjuaar.fsf@gitster.g/ (local)