Re: [PATCH cb/pedantic-build-for-developers] lazyload.h: fix warnings about mismatching function pointer types
flat view
From: Carlo Arenas <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-22 20:16:53
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:56 PM Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] wrote:
Here, GCC warns about every use of the INIT_PROC_ADDR macro, for example:
In file included from compat/mingw.c:8:
compat/mingw.c: In function 'mingw_strftime':
compat/win32/lazyload.h:38:12: warning: assignment to
'size_t (*)(char *, size_t, const char *, const struct tm *)'
{aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(char *, long long unsigned int,
const char *, const struct tm *)'} from incompatible pointer type
'FARPROC' {aka 'long long int (*)()'} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
38 | (function = get_proc_addr(&proc_addr_##function))
| ^
compat/mingw.c:1014:6: note: in expansion of macro 'INIT_PROC_ADDR'
1014 | if (INIT_PROC_ADDR(strftime))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~did you have CFLAGS adding -Wincompatible-pointer-types explicitly? This is the reason why the code that got merged to master had -Wno for this case.
(message wrapper for convenience). Insert a cast to keep the compiler happy. A cast is fine in these cases because they are generic function pointer values that have been looked up in a DLL.
I have a more complete "fix" which I got stuck testing GGG[1]; you are likely going to also hit -Wcast-function-type otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <redacted> --- How can this have worked ever without a warning?
POSIX have a specific exception that allows (void *) for this, it is incorrect though in platforms where pointers to code and data might be different (ex DOS with its segmented model) Carlo [1] https://github.com/git/git/pull/1094