Re: [PATCH/RFC] range-diff: make output format more useful for "rebase --onto"

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:04 PM Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

In a range-diff output, we often see an early part of an updated
series having no changes since the previous iteration.  After
applying an updated patch submission to the same base as the
previous round,
[...]
Now, after noticing that up to step #5 there is no change since the
previous round, cleaning up the application result with

    $ git rebase --onto 097b89c815 97b89c8150

will help making it easier to see that earliser part did not change
before committing this in the longer term history.

s/earliser/earlier/