Re: [PATCH 3/9] pack-write: refactor renaming in finish_tmp_packfile()

Taylor Blau [off-list ref] writes:

In each of these three, I wasn't able to decide if you wanted these
addressed in a newer version of this series, or if you were happy enough
with the result to pick it up. I'm happy to send you a new version, but
don't want to clog your inbox if you were already planning on picking
this up.

Well, it is often a no-cost operation to replace a topic that has
been in 'seen' with a newer round, so you do not have to worry about
my inbox.  As I often say, if it turns out to be a bad idea, I can
just drop it from 'seen' as if I didn't see it ;-)

Anyway.

If a newer version will come, I'd love to see the review comments at
least considered (be it from me or from anybody else) --- after all,
if the original were good enough, reviewer(s) wouldn't have raised
them as potential issues.

Of course, "considered" is the key word.  No need to blindly follow;
as long as there is a solid reason to justify why changing would be
worsening the well-written original.

Thanks.