Re: [PATCH v4 00/28] Support reftable ref backend for Git

Han-Wen Nienhuys [off-list ref] writes:

The bottom part of the errno series that I contributed has had ample
scrutiny. It's a cleanup, and all-in-all much less experimental than
the reftable work.  However, because it changes a calling convention
in the ref backend API, it causes difficulty with other topics
(notably: reftable). I would be in favor of graduating the series upto
"refs: make errno output explicit for read_raw_ref_fn" early to
provide a stable basis for other patches.

Very glad to see that the two of you are in agreement of the order
and the approach.  Let me replace the topics that have been queued
on 'seen' with the latest ones from Ævar, and we can go from there.

Thanks for a quick response.