Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] index-pack: add --progress-title option
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-24 21:41:20
On Tue, Aug 24 2021, Derrick Stolee wrote:
On 8/23/2021 7:02 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:quoted
+--progress-title:: + For internal use only. ++ +Set the title of the "Receiving objects" progress bar (it's "Indexing +objects" under `--stdin`).May I suggest a minor edit: Set the title of the progress bar. The title is "Receiving objects" by default and "Indexing objects" when `--stdin` is specified.
Thanks.
quoted
@@ -1806,6 +1808,10 @@ int cmd_index_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) input_len = sizeof(*hdr); } else if (!strcmp(arg, "-v")) { verbose = 1; + } else if (!strcmp(arg, "--progress-title")) {Unfortunate that we are not using the parse-opts API. Not your fault.quoted
+ if (progress_title || (i+1) >= argc)style nit: if (progress_title || i + 1 >= argc) Although, I notice a similar line elsewhere in the file, so this gets a pass. if (index_name || (i+1) >= argc)
Yeah, it's exactly copy/pasted from another thing doing the same sort of parsing in this file. Will keep it the same for this new code, and just note it. I think any subsequent change to refactor it will be easier if it's all consistent, v.s. some using i + 1, another putting it in parenthesis etc.
quoted
+ usage(index_pack_usage); + progress_title = argv[++i];One downside to this organization is that `--progress-title=X` will not work here. There are other `--<option-name>=X` options in this builtin, and the index output name is specified with the short name `-o X`. We should probably err to match the `--<option-name>=X` pattern in this file for now. An eventual conversion to standard option parsing would be helpful here, but I don't think is worth blocking this series.
*nod*.