On 2021-08-11 at 22:10:28, Joel Klinghed wrote:
At my work we use "fixup!" when pushing fixes to a review, using
the modified body to outline what issue the commit is addressing,
helping the reviewers to see intent and not just the end result.
All "fixup!" are then ofc. squashed before integration.
Same can be achieved with -m but --edit is generally
easier to work with in my experience.
Yeah, I do exactly the same thing. I want to write a nice explanation
of the change I made for the reviewer, but I don't want to preserve it
for the future.
I recently had a series that was 33 commits after squashing but with 117
before squashing, thanks to a series of very thorough and thoughtful
reviews, so in this kind of scenario, it can really be kind to the
reviewer to help them match up the change with their comment.
I've also once or twice used it to avoid a "fixup!" of a "fixup!" instead
of looking up the original target commit hash but that's just me being
lazy.
I'll add a test to check for previous behavior.
Thanks for catching this.
--
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Toronto, Ontario, CA