[PATCH] apply: keep buffer/size pair in sync when parsing binary hunks
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-10 01:01:55
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
We parse through binary hunks by looping through the buffer with code
like:
llen = linelen(buffer, size);
...do something with the line...
buffer += llen;
size -= llen;
However, before we enter the loop, there is one call that increments
"buffer" but forgets to decrement "size". As a result, our "size" is off
by the length of that line, and subsequent calls to linelen() may look
past the end of the buffer for a newline.
The fix is easy: we just need to decrement size as we do elsewhere.
This bug goes all the way back to 0660626caf (binary diff: further
updates., 2006-05-05). Presumably nobody noticed because it only
triggers if the patch is corrupted, and even then we are often "saved"
by luck. We use a strbuf to store the incoming patch, so we overallocate
there, plus we add a 16-byte run of NULs as slop for memory comparisons.
So if this happened accidentally, the common case is that we'd just read
a few uninitialized bytes from the end of the strbuf before producing
the expected "this patch is corrupted" error complaint.
However, it is possible to carefully construct a case which reads off
the end of the buffer. The included test does so. It will pass both
before and after this patch when run normally, but using a tool like
ASan shows that we get an out-of-bounds read before this patch, but not
after.
Reported-by: Xingman Chen <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
---
This was reported to the security list, but I think the impact is small
enough to just take it as a normal fix.
I hate the test, as it is brittle and subject to bitrot if we do things
like change the default strbuf hint size. If that does happen, it will
still pass; it just won't do anything interesting. But I would like some
record of how to reproduce, and I prefer this to putting something
hard-to-run in the commit message.
apply.c | 1 +
t/t4103-apply-binary.sh | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
index 44bc31d6eb..4ed4b27169 100644
--- a/apply.c
+++ b/apply.c@@ -1917,6 +1917,7 @@ static struct fragment *parse_binary_hunk(struct apply_state *state, state->linenr++; buffer += llen; + size -= llen; while (1) { int byte_length, max_byte_length, newsize; llen = linelen(buffer, size);
diff --git a/t/t4103-apply-binary.sh b/t/t4103-apply-binary.sh
index fad6d3f542..d370ecfe0d 100755
--- a/t/t4103-apply-binary.sh
+++ b/t/t4103-apply-binary.sh@@ -158,4 +158,27 @@ test_expect_success 'apply binary -p0 diff' ' test -z "$(git diff --name-status binary -- file3)" ' +test_expect_success 'reject truncated binary diff' ' + do_reset && + + # this length is calculated to get us very close to + # the 8192-byte strbuf we will use to read in the patch. + test-tool genrandom foo 6205 >file1 && + git diff --binary >patch && + + # truncate the patch at the second "literal" line, + # but exclude the trailing newline. We must use perl + # for this, since tools like "sed" cannot reliably + # produce output without the trailing newline. + perl -pe " + if (/^literal/ && \$count++ >= 1) { + chomp; + print; + exit 0; + } + " <patch >patch.trunc && + + do_reset && + test_must_fail git apply patch.trunc +' test_done
--
2.33.0.rc1.475.g023efe0ae4