Re: [PATCH v2] clone: Allow combining --bare and --origin

Øystein Walle [off-list ref] writes:

Hi again,

Thanks for accepting the patch.

quoted

It is somewhat unfortunate that we do not say what the name of the
"origin" is anywhere in the resulting configuration file.  The only
way to tell that "--origin somewhere" was used is to notice that there
is only one remote and its name is "somewhere".

This reads as self-contradictory to me. The word "origin" is nowhere in
the configuration file, that's true. But that's because the user chose
it to be that way, and the name the user chose is in the there.

In other words, if there were two remotes in the configuration file,
you cannot tell which one was given to --origin when you made the
repository with "git clone".

The reason I see it as self-contradictory is that I see two different
usages of the word "origin" in your email:

 1. A *term* meaning the repository that was cloned (e.g. 'name of the
 "origin"', remote.originName)

 2. The *name* of a remote ('there is only one remote and its name is
 [not "origin"]')

Seems you are aware since you write it in quotes :-) 

May be but #1 is not all that interesting.  

I meant the only one thing.  The user told Git that 'somewhere' is
the word, not 'origin' that is used by those who use the default
configuration, will be used to refer to the remote the repository
was cloned from.  In the first paragraph you quoted, I was referring
to the fact that the knowledge will be lost once you did "git remote
add elsewhere".

We cannot tell between 'somewhere' and 'elsewhere', which one is
what those who use the default configuration would refer to
'origin'---presumably, 'somewhere' being the --origin's argument
when "git clone" was run, has some significance over 'elsewhere' in
the user's mind, even after the latter is added to the repository.

But we'd end up treating them the same.  And something like
remote.originName would help that.  Otherwise, we'd end up sending
this message:

    Even if we give "--bare --origin yourfavouritename" to you now,
    unlike how 'origin' is treated in the default case, in the
    resulting repository, 'yourfavouritename' is not special at all.

Some people may want to treat yourfavouritename is not special at
all, while some people may want to treat yourfavouritename truly as
a replacement for 'origin' that is the default.  The message we
would be sending is that we'd ignore the latter folks.