Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 7 authors, 2021-08-03

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Change default merge backend from recursive to ort

From: Elijah Newren <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-03 01:05:10

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 4:46 PM Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Elijah,

On Sun, 1 Aug 2021, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
quoted
From: Elijah Newren <redacted>

There are a few reasons to switch the default:
[...]
I think it would be really fantastic to change to the new default right
after v2.33.0.

As to the patch, I only struggled slightly with the changes to
`sequencer.c`:
quoted
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 0bec01cf38e..a98de9a8d15 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static int do_recursive_merge(struct repository *r,
      for (i = 0; i < opts->xopts_nr; i++)
              parse_merge_opt(&o, opts->xopts[i]);

-     if (opts->strategy && !strcmp(opts->strategy, "ort")) {
+     if (!opts->strategy || strcmp(opts->strategy, "recursive")) {
At this stage, we're in `do_recursive_merge()`, and there is only one
caller, `do_pick_commit()`, and the caller is guarded by the following
condition:

        else if (!opts->strategy ||
                 !strcmp(opts->strategy, "recursive") ||
                 !strcmp(opts->strategy, "ort") ||
                 command == TODO_REVERT) {

The issue I see is with `git revert` allowing custom merge strategies. I
_think_ we need a slightly different patch here, something like this:

-       if (opts->strategy && !strcmp(opts->strategy, "ort")) {
+       if (!opts->strategy || !strcmp(opts->strategy, "ort")) {
quoted
              memset(&result, 0, sizeof(result));
              merge_incore_nonrecursive(&o, base_tree, head_tree, next_tree,
                                          &result);
@@ -3968,7 +3968,7 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r,
      o.branch2 = ref_name.buf;
      o.buffer_output = 2;

-     if (opts->strategy && !strcmp(opts->strategy, "ort")) {
+     if (!opts->strategy || strcmp(opts->strategy, "recursive")) {
It took me a while to convince myself that this is correct. At least now I
_think_ it is correct: `do_merge()` defines:

        const char *strategy = !opts->xopts_nr &&
                (!opts->strategy ||
                 !strcmp(opts->strategy, "recursive") ||
                 !strcmp(opts->strategy, "ort")) ?
                NULL : opts->strategy;

and then hands off to `git merge -s <strategy>` if `strategy` is set,
_before_ this hunk. Therefore we can be pretty certain that
`opts->strategy` is either not set, or "ort", or "recursive" at that
stage.

However, I think we could use the same idea I outlined in the previous
hunk, to make things more obvious:

-       if (opts->strategy && !strcmp(opts->strategy, "ort")) {
+       if (!opts->strategy || !strcmp(opts->strategy, "ort")) {

Thank you,
Dscho
quoted
              /*
               * TODO: Should use merge_incore_recursive() and
               * merge_switch_to_result(), skipping the call to
--
gitgitgadget
I'll include both suggestions in my next re-roll.  Thanks for the feedback!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help