Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] ssh signing: add test prereqs

On 29.07.21 21:09, Josh Steadmon wrote:

On 2021.07.28 19:36, Fabian Stelzer via GitGitGadget wrote:

quoted

From: Fabian Stelzer <redacted>
  
+test_lazy_prereq GPGSSH '
+	ssh_version=$(ssh-keygen -Y find-principals -n "git" 2>&1)
+	test $? != 127 || exit 1
+	echo $ssh_version | grep -q "find-principals:missing signature file"
+	test $? = 0 || exit 1;
+	mkdir -p "${GNUPGHOME}" &&
+	chmod 0700 "${GNUPGHOME}" &&
+	ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -N "" -C "git ed25519 key" -f "${GNUPGHOME}/ed25519_ssh_signing_key" >/dev/null &&
+	echo "\"principal with number 1\" $(cat "${GNUPGHOME}/ed25519_ssh_signing_key.pub")" >> "${GNUPGHOME}/ssh.all_valid.allowedSignersFile" &&
+	ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 2048 -N "" -C "git rsa2048 key" -f "${GNUPGHOME}/rsa_2048_ssh_signing_key" >/dev/null &&
+	echo "\"principal with number 2\" $(cat "${GNUPGHOME}/rsa_2048_ssh_signing_key.pub")" >> "${GNUPGHOME}/ssh.all_valid.allowedSignersFile" &&
+	ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -N "super_secret" -C "git ed25519 encrypted key" -f "${GNUPGHOME}/protected_ssh_signing_key" >/dev/null &&
+	echo "\"principal with number 3\" $(cat "${GNUPGHOME}/protected_ssh_signing_key.pub")" >> "${GNUPGHOME}/ssh.all_valid.allowedSignersFile" &&
+	cat "${GNUPGHOME}/ssh.all_valid.allowedSignersFile" &&
+	ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -N "" -f "${GNUPGHOME}/untrusted_ssh_signing_key" >/dev/null
+'
+
+SIGNING_KEY_PRIMARY="${GNUPGHOME}/ed25519_ssh_signing_key"
+SIGNING_KEY_SECONDARY="${GNUPGHOME}/rsa_2048_ssh_signing_key"
+SIGNING_KEY_UNTRUSTED="${GNUPGHOME}/untrusted_ssh_signing_key"
+SIGNING_KEY_WITH_PASSPHRASE="${GNUPGHOME}/protected_ssh_signing_key"
+SIGNING_KEY_PASSPHRASE="super_secret"
+SIGNING_ALLOWED_SIGNERS="${GNUPGHOME}/ssh.all_valid.allowedSignersFile"
+
+GOOD_SIGNATURE_TRUSTED='Good "git" signature for'
+GOOD_SIGNATURE_UNTRUSTED='Good "git" signature with'
+KEY_NOT_TRUSTED="No principal matched"
+BAD_SIGNATURE="Signature verification failed"
+

Is there a reason why we don't use these variables in the script above?

Also, in general I feel that it's better to add tests in the same commit
where new features are added, rather than having standalone test
commits.

Intially i wanted to fill them in the prereq but couldn't acces them in 
the tests then.

Thanks, i have moved the variables above the prereq and used them there 
as well. makes sense.
Also i have prefixed them now with GPGSSH so we don't collide with any 
other tests accidentally.