Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] maintenance: `git maintenance run` learned `--scheduler=<scheduler>`

On 13/07/21 09.22, Eric Sunshine wrote:

Since Lénaïc is a relative newcomer to the project, can we, as
reviewers, be clear that we don't expect him to perform the task of
generalizing strvec_split() just to get this series -- which is
already at v7 -- landed? I gave the previous round a pretty thorough
going-over and -- aside from one minor test-time bug -- didn't find
any show-stoppers which should prevent it from landing. While it may
be the case that the series has a superficial wart here and there
(such as #ifdef's in function bodies, and non-ASCII fancy comment
boxes), the review comments on the latest round have pretty much all
been subjective; I haven't seen any outright actionable observations.
Extra polishing based upon the subjective review comments can always
be done later atop Lénaïc's series (if someone -- not necessarily
Lénaïc -- wants to do so) without asking him for endless re-rolls.

In such situation when there is endless re-roll of patch series due to 
subjective reviews, we can ask for final call from the maintainer, right?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara