Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 5 authors, 2021-07-14

Re: [PATCH] pull: abort if --ff-only is given and fast-forwarding is impossible

From: Alex Henrie <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-11 20:00:34

On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 11:08 AM Felipe Contreras
[off-list ref] wrote:
Alex Henrie wrote:
quoted
The warning about pulling without specifying how to reconcile divergent
branches says that after setting pull.rebase to true, --ff-only can
still be passed on the command line to require a fast-forward. Make that
actually work.
I don't know where that is being said, but it's wrong: --ff-only is
meant for merge only.
quoted
--- a/builtin/pull.c
+++ b/builtin/pull.c
@@ -1046,9 +1046,14 @@ int cmd_pull(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)

      can_ff = get_can_ff(&orig_head, &merge_heads.oid[0]);

-     if (rebase_unspecified && !opt_ff && !can_ff) {
-             if (opt_verbosity >= 0)
-                     show_advice_pull_non_ff();
+     if (!can_ff) {
+             if (opt_ff) {
+                     if (!strcmp(opt_ff, "--ff-only"))
+                             die_ff_impossible();
As I've mentioned multiple times already, this is wrong.

The advice clearly says:

  You can also pass --rebase, --no-rebase, or --ff-only on the command
  line to override the configured default per invocation.

With your patch now this is even less true:

  git -c pull.ff=only pull --rebase
I think it's an improvement over the current situation. --no-rebase
does not override pull.ff=only, so it makes sense that --rebase does
not override pull.ff=only either. Besides, it's generally better to
abort instead of rewriting history if it's not perfectly clear that
the user meant to rewrite the history.

-Alex
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help