Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2021-07-06

Re: [PATCH v2] refs: make explicit that ref_iterator_peel returns boolean

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-06 19:55:00

Han-Wen Nienhuys [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:04 AM Han-Wen Nienhuys [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
So this corresponds to the bottommost step in the series that is
queued as hn/reftable, with the difference at the end of this
message.

Do you want me to replace that single step with this version and
rebuild the remainder of the topic on top?
Yes.

I'm hoping this can graduate soon, so the hn/reftable topic becomes
smaller (I don't know what that means for your organization of the
seen branch).
Any update on this? This wasn't queued for next, but I believe it should be.
Sorry, I thought you meant you wanted to fix up the bottommost
commit in that series, which I think was already done at 617480d7
(refs: make explicit that ref_iterator_peel returns boolean,
2021-05-19), and did not realize that you wanted a separate single
patch topic for this step, on top of which the remainder of the
other topic builds.

Will do.  Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help