Re: [PATCH v7] help: colorize man pages if man.color=true under less(1)
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-21 19:23:01
On Mon, Jun 21 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:quoted
So, in order for this change to have any effect: 1. color.man=true must be set in the config 2. The user must use less 3. Not have the same LESS_TERMCAP variables set (we call setenv(3) with overwrite=0) 4. Have color.ui enabled 5. Not have color.pager disabled 6. Not have git with stdout directed to a file 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87tun1qp91.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ (local) 2. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/119/colors-in-man-pages/147 Suggested-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <redacted> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted> --- On Tue, Jun 08 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:quoted
I've been running with this on my personal git build since May 26th. I haven't had any issues with it, and I like the new coloring. ... I think this is a good example of a change that we're better off just merging down and then reverting if the wider audience of git users hates it, rather than trying to come to some perfect consensus here on-list.My impression was tht we already had a rough consensus here on-list that it may be good to educate users who like this "new coloring" like you do to configure their "less", so that they consistently get the "new coloring" they like whether they are doing "git help git", "man git", or even "man ls", and the approach the posted patch takes will not help (it only affects "git help git" among these). I'd rather not to take it.Fair enough, here's a version I think you and others will find acceptable then. It allows users like me who like this to explicitly opt-in via color.man=true.Not really. [snip] I think it would be easier to understand to end-users if this were exposed as a new "mode", like "git help --web" and "git help --info" are different modes from the "git help --man", something like "git help --fancy-man" (or whatever is easy to type and explain, and also add it to the variants help.format knows about to make it easy to set the default). One advantage of doing so is that we do not have to worry about "ah, user has LESS_BLAH environment variable so we should disable this new mode here" etc. As long as the new mode is requested either via the command line option or help.format configuration, it can completely take it over. That simplifies the necessary explanation given to the users quite a lot, no?
The interaction between "git help" and "man"/"less" doesn't really have an equivalent in the rest of git as far as color output goes. Usually we emit colors via our own programs. But no, I think it makes the most sense to consider this orthagonal to help.format=man or man.viewer=<cmd>. We're not invoking a different man viewer or command, we're just expecting that mode to invoke the pager, and if that pager is less to have these variables tweak our color preferences.
[unsnip] Since the implementation of the posted patch, as I understand it, does not aim to affect both "git help -m foo" and "man git-foo" identically,
Aside from this patch I don't think it makes sense to view git's UI and
interaction with the pager like that.
To probably >95% of our users the "we invoke the pager" is just a
technical implementation details they're not aware of. Git just has
pretty colors by default, so I don't think it's jarring that "git help
xyz" and "man git-xyz" look different.
We also don't try to maintain the UI that:
git cmd >file &&
pager file
Gives you the same UX as:
# Invokes pager(1) for you
git cmd
Since we set e.g. PAGER_ENV already, I believe this was brought up in
past discussions. So we're already past the point of git adding its own
magic custom options to feed to the pager.
So I don't see the problem with having "a bit more like PAGER_ENV"
hidden behind a color.man=true config option in this case.
quoted
---- git-config - Get and set [...] SYNOPSIS -------- [...] 'git config' [<file-option>] [...] [...] The `--type=<type>` option instructs 'git config' to ensure [...] Will have "NAME" and "SECTION" shown as BOLD RED instead of BOLD, "git config" and other '-quoted parts in BLUE UNDERLINE instead of UNDERLINE, and `--type=<type>` and other `-quoted parts in RED BOLD instead of BOLD. The "Standout" setting is then used for the user's own search bar (invoked with "/") and prompt. See [2] for more examplesThere are BOLD RED and READ BOLD; are they differently rendered?
Yes, that's just an omission/mistake. It should be the "RED BOLD", i.e. "<COLOR> <ATTR>".