On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 06:05:08PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
Hi Jeff,
quoted
But having seen the earlier part of the thread, it looks like "are we on
Windows" is predicated on "! type -p cygpath", which seems a bit loose.
I also think "-p" is a bash-ism, so we'd want to avoid it before
determining whether we're on Windows to avoid a chicken-and-egg on other
platforms.
-Peff
What is the POSIX equivalent then of?
I don't think there is an equivalent for "-p". But regular "type" is
probably sufficient for this use (the "-p" is just suppressing aliases
and functions).
It would be nice if there was a more robust test in general, though
(after all, I could have something called "cygpath" on a non-Windows
system). I don't know what options there are to get info from bash,
though.
(I'd also clarify that I haven't been carefully following this thread,
so take any suggestion or comments from me with a grain of salt. I
mostly jumped in because it looked like there was a communication
confusion).
-Peff