On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:19:46PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
quoted
My point is that if you are going to repost a patch that has known
problems,
It was not known that it had problems.
That fact that person X said patch Y had a problem doesn't necessarily
mean that patch Y has a problem.
1. The problem in the past might not apply in the present
2. The problem X person had might be specific to his/her setup
3. The problem might be due a combination of patches, not the patch
itself
Plus many others.
A logical person sees evidence for what it is, and the only thing that
person X saying patch Y had a problem means, is that person X said patch
Y had a problem.
Wow.
For one thing, you could still relay the _report_ of a problem along
with the patch, which would be valuable information for reviewers.
But much more important, in my opinion: that you would dismiss without
further investigation a report of a bug from the one person who actually
had experience running with the patch implies a level of carelessness
that I'm not comfortable with for the project.
I had already given up on having substantive discussion with you, but I
had hoped I could help the project by pointing out relevant facts in
areas that you were working in. But if a simple statement like "this
segfaulted for me" is not even useful, then I don't see much point in
communicating with you at all.
-Peff