Re: [PATCH] test: fix for TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-14 08:40:15
Jeff King wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 10:44:10AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:quoted
quoted
Unfortunately, this isn't a complete solution.Software will never be perfect. We don't need to wait for a perfect solution, all we need is something better than the current siuation.Sure, but if you don't fully understand the situation (e.g., that --root and TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY are not equivalent), then you may end up revisiting the incomplete fix later,
The fact that you may end up revisiting a solution is a fact for *all* changes (including 2d14e13c56 (test output: respect $TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY, 2013-04-29)).
or even making things worse (as this patch did).
I think breaking the test suite is objectively worse than having a few extra files in the output directory, but to each his own.
quoted
quoted
I think solving the whole issue would require a mechanism for passing TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY in a way that can't be overridden (whether in an environment variable or the command-line).Why do we even have TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY in GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS? Looking for a reason there's 2d14e13c56 (test output: respect $TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY, 2013-04-29), there it says it's for valgrind/analyze.sh. I don't know who uses that script, or how. There's no documentaion, nothing on the mailing list, and nothing found on Google.Perhaps 268fac6919 (Add a script to coalesce the valgrind outputs, 2009-02-04) is enlightening.
That makes it clearer.
I don't know if anybody still uses it these days, though. I suspect it's outlived its usefulness, in that we would typically not have any valgrind errors at all (so coalescing them is not that interesting). Possibly folks investigating leak-checking via valgrind could find it useful, but even there I think LSan is a much better path forward.
Yeah, but even if they do run this tool, they can set TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY manually. The needs of the few should not otweight needs of the many.
quoted
So maybe:diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index c3565fc0f8..2e25489569 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile@@ -2790,9 +2790,6 @@ GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS: FORCE @echo PAGER_ENV=\''$(subst ','\'',$(subst ','\'',$(PAGER_ENV)))'\' >>$@+ @echo DC_SHA1=\''$(subst ','\'',$(subst ','\'',$(DC_SHA1)))'\' >>$@+ @echo X=\'$(X)\' >>$@+ -ifdef TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY - @echo TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY=\''$(subst ','\'',$(subst ','\'',$(TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY)))'\' >>$@+ -endifI don't personally have any problem with that. It does mean that "make t1234-foo.sh" will behave differently than "./t1234-foo.sh", but that is already true if you set GIT_TEST_OPTS.
Only if you haven't changed TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY since the last time you ran 'make' on the top level directory. And of course if somebody really wants their environment to be honored, that's what "make -e t1234-foo.sh" is for. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras