Johannes Sixt wrote:
then diff3 must display the conflict as
12<ABC|34=AXC>56
to be technically correct. RCS style can coalesce A and C outside of the
conflict and display it as
12A<B=X>C34
and *that* is the helpful part of this simpler style.
I have trouble translating the above to what I'm familiar with in my
mind, so...
diff2:
1
2
A
<<<<<<< l
B
=======
X
>>>>>>> r
C
5
6
diff3:
1
2
<<<<<<< l
A
B
C
||||||| b
3
4
=======
A
X
C
>>>>>>> r
5
6
I personally don't mind at all having a few extra lines in order to
visualize what actually happened.
But of course there's zdiff3:
1
2
A
<<<<<<< l
B
||||||| b
3
4
=======
X
>>>>>>> r
C
5
6
Which is the best of both worlds, even if not technically accurate.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras