Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 7 authors, 2021-06-17

Re: [PATCH 1/7] test: add merge style config test

flat view

From: Phillip Wood <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-10 14:59:47

On 10/06/2021 14:26, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Phillip Wood wrote:
quoted
On 09/06/2021 20:28, Felipe Contreras wrote:
quoted
We want to test different combinations of merge.conflictstyle, and a new
file is the best place to do that.
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/t/t6440-config-conflict-markers.sh b/t/t6440-config-conflict-markers.sh
new file mode 100755
quoted
quoted
+test_expect_success 'merge' '
+	test_create_repo merge &&
+	(
+		cd merge &&
+
+		fill 1 2 3 >content &&
+		git add content &&
+		git commit -m base &&
+
+		git checkout -b r &&
+		echo six >>content &&
+		git commit -a -m right &&
+
+		git checkout master &&
+		echo 7 >>content &&
+		git commit -a -m left &&
+
+		test_must_fail git merge r &&
+		! grep -E "\|+" content &&
! grep "|"  would be simpler and just as effective.
But that would fail if there's a "command1 | command2".
I don't understand. What are you expecting content to contain? Why doesn't "\|+" fail in that case?
quoted
This is quite a weak
test, something like "^|||||| " would be a stronger test for conflict
markers
But that doesn't work in all the tests.
So test for what you actually expect, you don't need to have the same check in all the tests if the expected output is different.

Best Wishes

Phillip
Cheers.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help