Derrick Stolee [off-list ref] writes:

On 6/7/2021 8:34 AM, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:

quoted

From: Derrick Stolee <redacted>

...

quoted

+			old_entry = make_transient_cache_entry(
+					entry[0].mode, &entry[0].oid,
+					old_path, /* stage */ 0);

I didn't realize this before I started integrating with
v2.32.0 (which I should have done before submitting v5) that
make_transient_cache_entry() has changed its prototype to
include a memory pool parameter.

Sorry for the trouble---these are usually all known to me for topics
I happened to have picked up in 'seen', since I try to make it a rule
that 'seen' must be a descendant of 'master'.

How can I usefully communicate the conflicts I find out during the
integration cycles to topic owners, I wonder.

Thanks.