Thread (29 messages) flat view 29 messages, 9 authors, 2021-06-04

Re: Gmail OAuth2 in git send-email

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-03 08:33:22

On Wed, Jun 02 2021, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,

Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
quoted
We wonder whether git send-email can support Gmail OAuth2 so that we can
seamlessly send patches without having to choose either action. But however,
we have to create a GCP project [1] first in order to enable Gmail API. This
can be overkill for some folks, but unfortunately that's the only way.
Yes, that's how I have mutt and other tools working with my Gmail
account set up.  See [1] for details.
quoted
If we want to enable support for Gmail OAuth2, should we hands-off API
configuration to git send-email users, or should we configure it on behalf
of them? Note that when we go the former approach, some Gmail users simply
can't afford GCP pricing for whatever reason
I didn't have to pay for GCP in order to set this up; I only had to
follow the instructions at
https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2 to create a
client ID and client secret for oauth access.

Alas, I don't think Git can provide its own client secret to do this
out of the box.  I could imagine Git providing a way to supply an API
key at build time, but distros would need to go through a procedure
similar to [2] to make use of it for their own builds.  If someone
wants to set that up, I think that would make sense as its _own_
separate package --- e.g. a "sendgmail" command that "git send-email"
could use via the --sendmail-cmd option.  That way, it would be useful
for a variety of calling programs and not just Git.
It's been a while but I set this up at some point, why would git or
distros need to make/register a private key? Last I checked you can take
software like git-send-email or whatever, and just register a new
"jonathan's e-mail sending script" with Google's OAuth thingy.

That "jonathan's e-mail sending script" happens to be git-send-email
with a bit of configuration isn't something they know or care about.

That seems like a much better approach than some centralized solution,
since as you note doing that will require some authority to manage keys
etc, and presumably if "jonathan's e-mail sending script" inadvertently
starts using git-send-email.perl to send spam, that would currently not
result in ban on "ævar's e-mail sending script", but if the two were
registered as the same application Google might overzelously ban those
as two tenticles of the same misbehaving "app".
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help