Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2021-05-25

Re: [PATCH] t1092: use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY for consistent results

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-25 21:15:00

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Well, not so well X-<.  It seems that some builds are not happy with
this change.  See https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/876229761
specifically these two:

    https://github.com/git/git/runs/2669177395?check_suite_focus=true#step:7:3549
    https://github.com/git/git/runs/2669080101?check_suite_focus=true#step:6:988

I suspect that it has something to do with 32-bit platforms?
Reverting the change that was squashed in seems to do the job.
https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/876338380 is labelled as
'seen' but it is 'next' that failed in the message I am responding
to plus the revert of s/=100000/=-1/g.

Let's queue the 100000 version for now and get the =inf patch
applied after the release.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help