Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] merge-ort: add data structures for in-memory caching of rename detection
flat view
From: Derrick Stolee <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-18 13:57:40
On 5/17/2021 11:55 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
quoted
/* * cached_irrelevant: Caching of rename_sources that aren't relevant. * * cached_pairs records both renames and deletes. Sometimes we * do not know if a path is a rename or a delete because we pass * RELEVANT_LOCATION to diffcore_rename_extended() which might * describe a path as "irrelevant" instead of as a "rename" or "delete". * We need to cache such paths too, but separately from cached_pairs. */ Does this make sense? diffcore_rename_extended() might need an update to match this extra, explicit state.Hmm, let's flesh out the description a bit and try to be more explicit. How about: /* * cached_irrelevant: Caching of rename_sources that aren't relevant. * * If we try to detect a rename for a source path and succeed, it's * part of a rename. If we try to detect a rename for a source path * and fail, then it's a delete. If we do not try to detect a rename * for a path, then we don't know if it's a rename or a delete. If * merge-ort doesn't think the path is relevant, then we just won't * cache anything for that path. But there's a slight problem in * that merge-ort can think a path is RELEVANT_LOCATION, but due to * commit 9bd342137e ("diffcore-rename: determine which * relevant_sources are no longer relevant", 2021-03-13), * diffcore-rename can downgrade the path to RELEVANT_NO_MORE. To * avoid excessive calls to diffcore_rename_extended() we still need * to cache such paths, though we cannot record them as either * renames or deletes. So we cache them here as a "turned out to be * irrelevant *for this commit*" as they are often also irrelevant * for subsequent commits, though we will have to do some extra * checking to see whether such paths become relevant for rename * detection when cherry-picking/rebasing subsequent commits. */
This is more informative, thanks. -Stolee