Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p

Bagas Sanjaya [off-list ref] writes:


[...]

quoted

Exact historical semantics of -m is still provided by
--diff-merges=separate.

Better say "Previously, the -m semantics is same as
--diff-merges=separate".

Oops, unlike the rest of your suggestions, this one I don't get, sorry.

Thanks,

-- Sergey Organov