Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] diff-merges: let -m imply -p

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Sergey Organov [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Fix long standing inconsistency between -c/--cc that do imply -p, on
one side, and -m that did not imply -p, on the other side.
...
Exact historical semantics of -m is still provided by
--diff-merges=separate.

Updates in v1:

OK, so this is [v2] not v1 ;-)

I dunno. Actually, I'm a bit confused.

Is simple [PATCH] v0 or v1? For me, as C-programmer, it's obviously v0,
and that's what

  git format-patch --reroll-count=0
 
produces anyway, and the next one is

  git format-patch --reroll-count=1

that produces [PATCH v1]. That's how it became v1.

Will replace.  Thanks.

Thanks!

-- Sergey Organov