Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2021-05-13

Re: [PATCH 1/2] prompt.h: clarify the non-use of git_prompt

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-13 23:03:45

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
I have a strong objection against the above phrasing.

If we are asking user for interactive input, this SHOULD be used,
especially if we might be reading the data to work on from the
standard input and we may need to ask the user to interactively
instruct us what to do to that data.  The only plausible reason that
we may want to avoid it and instead prefer the (misnamed)
read_line_interactively() to read whatever from the standard input
(which may not be "interactive" at all, which is why I said
"misnamed") is because our test framework does not use setsid (and
setsid(1) may not be universally available) with pty to emulate tty
input, isn't it?
quoted
 char *git_prompt(const char *prompt, int flags);
 
 int git_read_line_interactively(struct strbuf *line);
So, here is an alternative that nudges users away from this helper,
but with honesty.  I also suggest a better name for that misnamed
"interactively" function in the comment, but will leave it as an
exercise to readers to come up with a patch to rename the function.

/*
 * Give prompt to the user and accept interactive input from the
 * controlling terminal (/dev/tty).  This function can be used even
 * when the standard input is being used to feed us real data to
 * operate on, as we open /dev/tty ourselves for user interaction.
 *
 * In a codepath that never uses the standard input for real data,
 * consider using git_read_line_from_standard_input() instead, as it
 * is easier to write tests for (our test framework currently does not
 * make it easy to simulate end-user input coming from /dev/tty).
 */
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help