Re: [PATCH v2] Writing down mail list etiquette.
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-12 08:57:30
On Tue, May 11 2021, Dave Huseby wrote:
After violating a few unspoken etiquette rules that were spotted by Christian Couder [off-list ref], Filipe Contreras [off-list ref] suggested that somebody write a guide. Since I was the latest cause of this perenial discussion, I took it upon myself to learn from my mistakes and document the fixes. Thanks to Junio [off-list ref] for providing links to similar discussions in the past and Stefan Moch [off-list ref] for pointing out where the related documentation already existed in the tree.
Improvements in this area are most needed, so thanks for working on this. We should not have a new file describing this though, we already cover the content you're adding here partially in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, and some more in Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt (e.g. a passing mention of in-reply-to etiquette), with this applied we'd have discussion of these related topics in three places. I had some rough WIP patches to update Documentation/SubmittingPatches to address some of what you're adding here, which I've discarded, but I submitted some related patches just now as [1]. As you can see from that topic we e.g. already have MUA-specific tips in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, your addition of a section discussing mutt's config here is another thing we'd be duplicating/unnecessarily splitting across multiple places. I do think it's going to be hard to update SubmittingPatches, for example it has a long section going on about the specific format of patches to craft for the ML, as if anyone's using anything other than git-format-patch these days (it was written before that existed/was as established). I suspect though that any suggestion to simply remove most/all of that for simplicity will probably be met with (IMO unwarranted resistance), which is why I gave up on this the other day before even submitting patches to the ML. But regardless of that, the post-image after your patch of having another place we discuss the same/related topic would be worse, we really should have one canonical guide, so your patch(es) should be amending/splitting Documentation/SubmittingPatches, not duplicating it. 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/cover-0.3-0000000000-20210512T084137Z-avarab@gmail.com/ (local)