Yuri wrote:
On 5/6/21 1:40 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
quoted
No. Commits are most definitely not public. Not unless you do
`git push`, and only if you push to a public repository.
I have countless commits on local branches that nobody would every see.
Many on a "tmp" branch.
So you advocate to use branches? If branches are same or better than
stash, why was the stash feature created?
Branches are for long-term sequences of useful commits.
Stashes are for short-term crappy commits.
They serve a different purpose.
--
Felipe Contreras