Re: [PATCH 0/5] streaming.c: refactor for smaller + easier to understand code
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-05 13:57:17
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 02:33:27PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
This is a prep series for my yet-to-be-sent re-roll of [1], aka. ab/fsck-unexpected-type. Jeff King had a comment in [2] saying it was odd to have an "oi2" variable, that was because there was on an "oi" name already defined via the new-gone open_method_decl(loose) macro. As we'll see we could do without the initial "oi" and a few other types of indirection in this interface. Junio: Could you eject ab/fsck-unexpected-type while this is being considered/cooked? I didn't really see how to address Jeff's feedback about that variable name in a way that wouldn't just make something like this refactoring part of an even bigger series. I think ejecting the functional changes & trying to get this in first is the least worst approach at this point. Eventually I'll submit a re-roll of ab/fsck-unexpected-type either based on this, or master (if it's landed already).
I think my feedback was really just: if that patch didn't refactor parse_loose_header() to get rid of the "simple" and extended versions, then you wouldn't have to touch streaming.c at all. It could just continue to use the simple version. That said, I don't mind the cleanups here, especially getting rid of the macros. -Peff