Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:
Change a few functions that relied on a "false" being the last
statement in the function to use an explicit "return 1" like the other
functions in this file.
While not wrong per-se, this and a few other changes in this series
are typical of your multi-patch series that unnecessarily consume
reviewer bandwidth that could be better spent on other more
important and correctness sensitive steps (like 07/16) in the same
series.
You should find a good balance to avoid wearing out and distracting
your reviewers---they are the most scarce resource around here that
must be shared by other people, not just with other topics of your
own.
Thanks.