Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Sergey Organov [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
2. We have descriptive long name for every other option, and it'd be an
exception if we'd have none for --diff-merges=m. In fact, it's
--diff-merges=m that could have been removed, but it'd break resemblance
with --cc and -c that both do have their --diff-merges=cc and
--diff-merges=c counterparts.
Hmph, a devil's advocate in me suspects that it may just be arguing
why user-configurable 'default' is a bad idea, though.
After you've said this I figured the option might have been simply
called --diff-merges=on. Recall that we already have --diff-merges=off.
Makes more sense than --diff-merges=default?
-- Sergey Organov