Re: [PATCH v4] [GSOC]trailer: pass arg as positional parameter
flat view
From: ZheNing Hu <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-29 13:44:59
Christian Couder [off-list ref] 于2021年3月29日周一 下午5:05写道:
quoted
Yes, $ARG or $1 are always exist because of: arg = xstrdup(""); so I think maybe we don't even need this judge in `apply_command`? + if (arg) + strvec_push(&cp.args, arg);Yeah, I haven't looked at the code, but that might be a good simplification. If you work on this, please submit it in a separate commit.
Well, if necessary, I'll put it in another commit, maybe I should double check to see if there's anything special going on.
quoted
quoted
Another way to do it would be to have another config option called `trailer.<token>.alwaysRunCmd` to tell if the cmd specified by `trailer.<token>.cmd` should be run even if no '<token>=<value>' argument is passed on the command line. As we are introducing `trailer.<token>.cmd`, it's a good time to wonder if this would be a better design. But this issue is quite complex, because of the fact that 'trailer.<token>.ifMissing' and 'trailer.<token>.ifExists' also take a part in deciding if the command will be run.Actually after thinking about it, I think it might be better, instead of `trailer.<token>.alwaysRunCmd`, to add something like `trailer.<token>.runMode` that could take multiple values like:
If really can achieve it is certainly better than 'alwaysRunCmd'. The following three small configuration options look delicious. But I think it needs to be discussed in more detail:
- "beforeCLI": would make it run once, like ".command" does now before any CLI trailer are processed
Does "beforeCLI" handle all trailers? Or is it just doing something to add empty value trailers?
- "forEachCLIToken": would make it run once for each trailer that has the token, like ".command" also does now, the difference would be that the value for the token would be passed in the $1 argument
This is exactly same as before.
- "afterCLI": would make it run once after all the CLI trailers have been processed and it could pass the different values for the token if any in different arguments: $1, $2, $3, ...
I might get a little confused here: What's the input for $1,$2,$3? Is users more interested in dealing with trailers value or a line of the trailer?
This would make it possible to extend later if the need arises for more different times or ways to run configured commands.quoted
In fact, I would prefer this design, because if I don’t add any trailers, the trailer.<token>.command I set will be executed, which may be very distressing sometimes, and `alwayRunCmd` is the user I hope that "trailers" can be added automatically, and other trailers.<token>.command will not be executed automatically. This allows the user to reasonably configure the commands that need to be executed. This must be a very comfortable thing.I agree that it should be easier and more straightforward, than it is now, to configure this.quoted
But as you said, to disable the automatic addition in the original .command and use the new .alwaysRunCmd, I’m afraid there are a lot of things to consider. Perhaps future series of patches can be considered to do it.Yeah, support for `trailer.<token>.runMode` might be added in different commits at least and possibly later in a different patch series. There are the following issues to resolve, though, if we want to focus only on a new ".cmd" config option: - how and when should it run by default,
Do you mean that ".cmd" can get rid of the ".command" auto-add problem in this patch series? This might be a good idea if I can add the three modes you mentioned above in the later patch series.
- how to explain that in the doc, and maybe - how to improve the current description of what happens for ".command"quoted
quoted
This mechanism is the reason why a trick, when setting up a 'trailer.foo.command' trailer, is to also set 'trailer.foo.ifexists' to "replace", so that the first time the command is run (with $ARG replaced with the empty string) it will add a foo trailer with a default value, and if it is run another time, because a 'foo=bar' argument is passed on the command line, then the trailer with the default value will be replaced by the value computed from running the command again with $ARG replaced with "bar". Another trick is to have the command output nothing when $ARG is the empty string along with using --trim-empty. This way the command will create an empty trailer, when it is run the first time, and if it's not another time, then this empty trailer will be removed because of --trim-empty.It looks very practical indeed.quoted
quoted
I cannot quite judge if what we came up with in the above description is sufficient.I don't think it's sufficient. I think that, while we are at it, a bit more thinking/discussion is required to make sure we want to keep the same design as 'trailer.<token>.command'.Sure. I agree that more discussion is needed. I think if the documents that once belonged to .command are copied to .cmd, will the readers be too burdensome to read them? Will it be better to migrate its documentation until we completely delete .command?My opinion (if we focus only on adding ".cmd") is that: - for simplicity for now it should run at the same time as ".command", the only difference being how the argument is passed (using $1 instead of textually replacing $ARG) - the doc for ".command" should be first improved if possible, and then moved over to ".cmd" saying for ".command" that ".command" is deprecated in favor of ".cmd" but otherwise works as ".cmd" except that instead using $1 the value is passed by textually replacing $ARG which could be a safety and correctness issue.
I agree with you. There may be need some discretion.
Another way to work on all this, would be to first work on adding support for `trailer.<token>.runMode` and on improving existing documentation, and then to add ".cmd", which could then by default use a different ".runMode" than ".command".
I think the task can be put off until April. Deal with the easier ".cmd" first.
quoted
quoted
quoted
This, too, but until ".command" is removed, wouldn't it be better for readers to keep both variants, as the distinction between $ARG and $1 needs to be illustrated?So the correct solution should be to keep the original .command Examples, and then give the .cmd examples again.Maybe we could take advantage of ".cmd" to show other nice possibilities to use all of this. Especially if support for `git commit --trailer ...` is already merged, we might be able to use it in those examples, or perhaps add some examples to the git commit doc.
Oh, the 'commit --trailer' may still be queuing, It may take a while.
Best, Christian.
Thanks. -- ZheNing Hu