Re: [PATCH 0/5] Parallel Checkout (part 2)

Matheus Tavares [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Let's redo part-1 on top of 'master' first without such a merge; it
has been out of 'next' so we can do so easily without wanting for
the tip of 'next' to get rewound.

Thanks!

I saw you've added the "entry.h" inclusion that was missing at
builtin/stash when merging this branch on 'seen'. However, now that
part-1 is based on 'master', the branch is no longer buildable without
this fix. So could we perhaps squash this change directly into the
relevant commit in this series?

Yeah, that was the kind of thing I had in mind when I suggested you
to "Let's redo part-1 on top of 'master'".

I'll mark the topic to be "expecting a reroll" for now, as I am deep
in today's integration cycle.

Thanks.