Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix all leaks in t0001

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

I think it's worth doing. The reason t0000 passes is because it was my
reference script when adding UNLEAK() back in:

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170905130149.agc3zp3s6i6e5aki@sigill.intra.peff.net/ (local)

(which might be of historical interest if you haven't read it). I knew
that the next step would be tediously going through the test suite
looking at the tool results, and I somehow stalled on that part. ;)
...
I haven't looked at the individual patches yet. I'll respond to them
individually.

Thanks for working on this, and reviewing the result.

I agree with Peff's review comments and will look forward to seeing
a new iteration that updates the issues pointed out, which range from
coding styles to constness---IIUC, none of them were rocket science
to correct.