Re: [PATCH 6/7] test-lib: make --verbose output valid TAP
From: SZEDER Gábor <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-09 21:32:10
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:57:03PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/t/README b/t/README index 2cc8cbc7185..f09d94e754e 100644 --- a/t/README +++ b/t/README@@ -157,10 +157,13 @@ appropriately before running "make". Short options can be bundled, i.e. -V:: --verbose-log:: - Write verbose output to the same logfile as `--tee`, but do - _not_ write it to stdout. Unlike `--tee --verbose`, this option + An alias for `--verbose --tee`. This option is safe to use when stdout is being consumed by a TAP parser - like `prove`. Implies `--tee` and `--verbose`. + like `prove`. + Historically this option was different from `--verbose --tee` + and would not write any verbose output to stdout to ensure the + TAP-correctness of the output. The TAP-correctness of the + output is now sanity checked by the test library,Not everyone is using a TAP harness to run the tests, and, therefore, '--verbose-log' should not spew out verbose output to the terminal.IOW even though --verbose-log was meant as a hack to make prove happy, you've since come to like the "verbose in log, but not stdout" mode and want that kept?
Yes, '--verbose-log' proved to be really convenient, even if it was meant to solve a different issue.
Yes, this patch takes that mode away.
Yes, I can change it.
Would your use-case for this be satisfied by having prove(1) just emit
different output for you in this scenario, so you'd need to invoke this
as something like:
prove <test> :: --verbose --tee # or --verbose-logI use prove to run the test suite, but I don't and won't use prove to run a single test. The behavior of './t1234-foo.sh -V' with or without '-x' should not change without _very_ convincing reasons. "We now output valid TAP even with --verbose, so we don't need it for the TAP harness" is definitely not convincing.
Becuse the advantage of this series is that that sort of thing becomes
really trivial without everything needing to be hardcoded in
test-lib.sh, observe (this is with my series):
0 $ PERL5LIB=. prove -v --formatter=SZEDERVerboseLog ./t0201-gettext-fallbacks.sh :: --verbose-logWell, this doesn't look trivial at all, does it? In fact, I consider this unusably convoluted.
# lib-gettext: No is_IS UTF-8 locale available
# lib-gettext: No is_IS ISO-8859-1 locale available
ok 1 - sanity: $GIT_INTERNAL_GETTEXT_SH_SCHEME is set (to fallthrough)
ok 2 - sanity: $GIT_INTERNAL_GETTEXT_TEST_FALLBACKS is set
ok 3 - sanity: $GIT_INTERNAL_GETTEXT_SH_SCHEME" is fallthrough
ok 4 - gettext: our gettext() fallback has pass-through semantics
ok 5 - eval_gettext: our eval_gettext() fallback has pass-through semantics
ok 6 - eval_gettext: our eval_gettext() fallback can interpolate variables
ok 7 - eval_gettext: our eval_gettext() fallback can interpolate variables with spaces
ok 8 - eval_gettext: our eval_gettext() fallback can interpolate variables with spaces and quotes
# passed all 8 test(s)
1..8
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=8, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.07 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.10 CPU)
Result: PASS
$ wc -l test-results/t0201-gettext-fallbacks.out
75 test-results/t0201-gettext-fallbacks.out
All without any patching on top to the test-lib.sh, just:
$ cat SZEDERVerboseLog.pm
package SZEDERVerboseLog::Session;
use base 'TAP::Formatter::Console::Session';
sub result {
my ($self, $result) = @_;
return if $result->is_unknown;
return $self->SUPER::result($result);
}
package SZEDERVerboseLog;
use strict;
use warnings;
use base 'TAP::Formatter::Console';
sub open_test {
my ($self, $test, $parser) = @_;
my $session = SZEDERVerboseLog::Session->new( {
name => $test,
formatter => $self,
parser => $parser,
} );
return $session;
}
1;
The "is_unknown" is everything that's not TAP syntax.