Re: [PATCH] fetch-pack: do not mix --pack_header and packfile uri

By the way, the band-aid in this patch may be OK for the upcoming
release (purely because it is easy to see that is sufficient for
today's codebase), but I said the above because I worry about the
health of the codebase in the longer term.  The "pass_header" may
not stay to be the only difference between the URI packfile and
in-stream packfile in the way they make index-pack invocations.

That is true, but at the same time, I think it's better to have the
arguments be the same because there are options (e.g. --promisor and
--fsck-objects) that have to be duplicated, and I think that for the
most part, the URI packfiles and the inline packfile will be processed
identically.