Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] Simple IPC Mechanism

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

And by "not interested" I don't mean that I think the topic is without
value. Far from it; I think this is an important area to be working in.
But it's complex and time-consuming to review. So I was hoping somebody
with more expertise and interest in the problem space would do that part
of the review, and I could continue to focus on other stuff. That may be
wishful thinking, though. :)

I was not paying close attention to this series, and was planning to
visit it before merging it to 'next' but only to ensure that changes
to any existing code would not regress existing callers, so it seems
that we two have been with pretty much the same attitude;-)