Re: [PATCH 04/10] test-lib functions: add an --annotated-tag option to "test_commit"

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:

Yeah, as noted in the last paragraph of the commit message:
    
    The placement of --annotated-tag after "notick" in the case of the
    documentation, and then after "no_tag" in the case of the code is
    slightly inconsistent. It's to evade a merge conflict with two other
    commits adding a --printf option, and another one adding documentation
    for --no-tag.

So the existing patch + not doing a bigger refactoring is because I
didn't want to cause conflicts for you to solve with other in-flight
topics. It would be easier with ab/pickaxe-pcre2 merged down :)

As things that are not yet in 'master' will not be merged down for a
few weeks anyway, the conflicts don't matter that much---it is a
valid choice not to accept new topics that conflicts with topics
cooking in 'next' after all.  That way, the number of topics that
folks have to look at will not increase, which gives more opportunity
for topics that are already in 'seen' to get reviewed ;-)