Re: [PATCH 1/2] pretty: add %(describe)
From: René Scharfe. <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-03 06:32:33
Am 01.03.21 um 18:45 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
René Scharfe. [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Subject: [PATCH] t4205: assert %(describe) test coverage Document that the test is covering both describable and undescribable commits. Suggested-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <redacted> --- t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh b/t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh index b47a0bd9eb..cabdf7d57a 100755 --- a/t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh +++ b/t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh@@ -965,8 +965,17 @@ test_expect_success 'log --pretty=reference is colored appropriately' ' test_expect_success '%(describe) vs git describe' ' git log --format="%H" | while read hash do - echo "$hash $(git describe $hash)" + if desc=$(git describe $hash) + then + : >expect-contains-good + else + : >expect-contains-bad + fi && + echo "$hash $desc" done >expect && + test_path_exists expect-contains-good && + test_path_exists expect-contains-bad &&Hmph, I am not sure why we want temporary files for this (and I doubt this "documenting" adds that much value to the tests to begin with), but OK. Will queue.
Variables would suffice, but make debugging harder. test_path_exists will at least print a suggestive file name. Perhaps we should add a test_assert? The added checks guard against neutering the test accidentally e.g. by tagging the currently undescribable commit in the setup phase. That would be hard to detect without it.
quoted
git log --format="%H %(describe)" >actual 2>err && test_cmp expect actual && test_must_be_empty err -- 2.30.1