Re: [PATCH v3 35/35] userdiff tests: add basic test for ruby
flat view
From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-27 07:30:31
Am 24.02.21 um 20:51 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add a test for the Ruby pattern added way back in ad8c1d9260 (diff: add ruby funcname pattern, 2008-07-31). The "One/Two" picking demonstrates existing behavior, and a general case where we may not do what the user expects since we're not aware of the indentation level. The code is modified from the Ruby code we have in-tree at Documentation/asciidoctor-extensions.rb. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted> --- t/t4018-diff-funcname.sh | 1 - t/t4018/ruby.sh | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 t/t4018/ruby.shdiff --git a/t/t4018-diff-funcname.sh b/t/t4018-diff-funcname.sh index b0c2782d067..7793d7652d5 100755 --- a/t/t4018-diff-funcname.sh +++ b/t/t4018-diff-funcname.sh@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' ' html objc pascal - ruby tex EOFdiff --git a/t/t4018/ruby.sh b/t/t4018/ruby.sh new file mode 100755 index 00000000000..ef8a154421a --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t4018/ruby.sh@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# +# See ../t4018-diff-funcname.sh's test_diff_funcname() +# + +test_diff_funcname 'ruby: "def" over "class/module"' \ + 8<<\EOF_HUNK 9<<\EOF_TEST +def process(parent) +EOF_HUNK +require 'asciidoctor' + +module Git + module Documentation + class SomeClass + use_some + + def process(parent) + puts("hello") + puts(ChangeMe) + end + end + end +end +EOF_TEST + +test_diff_funcname 'ruby: "class" over "class/module"' \ + 8<<\EOF_HUNK 9<<\EOF_TEST +class Two +EOF_HUNK +module Git + module Documentation + class One + end + + class Two + # Spacing for -U1
Again: -U0 is the default by now.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ ChangeMe + end + end +end +EOF_TEST + +test_diff_funcname 'ruby: picks first "class/module/def" before changed context' \ + '-U1' \ + 8<<\EOF_HUNK 9<<\EOF_TEST +class One +EOF_HUNK +module Git + module Documentation + class One + end + + class Two + ChangeMe + end + end +end +EOF_TEST
Why does this test need -U1? Wouldn't it be sufficient to change the expected text to "class Two"? And if the answer is "yes", I again do not see the need for a shell script test here; the simplified version would do. -- Hannes